Todd William Lamb v. Sharon Lynn Herz
This text of 60 F.3d 823 (Todd William Lamb v. Sharon Lynn Herz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 F.3d 823
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Todd William LAMB, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Sharon Lynn HERZ, Defendant--Appellee.
No. 95-6540.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 31, 1995.
Decided: July 6, 1995.
Todd William Lamb, appellant pro se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court as to absolute immunity. Lamb v. Herz, No. CA-95-498-AW (D. Md. Mar. 7, 1995; Mar. 28, 1995); see Burke v. Miller, 580 F.2d 108, 109-10 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 930 (1979). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 823, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24839, 1995 WL 419133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-william-lamb-v-sharon-lynn-herz-ca4-1995.