Todd v. Williamson

12 S.C.L. 148
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 15, 1821·Published

Opinions

Mr. Justice Gantt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

I thought on the trial of this case, and am still of the [149]*149yams opinion, that the burthen of the proof lay on the defendant, to shew that the judgment had been satisfied. A levy made may raise a presumption, and only so, that the execution has been satisfied by a subsequent sale of the goods levied on; and if such was the fact, the affirmation could be easily made to appear by the adduction of the testi ■ mony in support of it by the defendant hiihself. The entry * however of the levy, on the back of the execution, was ac • companied with a statement, which shewed that no further proceedings had taken place.

Maxcy, for the motion, ieoz/, contra.

After stating that the execution had been levied on a side-board, the constable making it, adds the following' words, a no further proceedings ; the property given up to defendant; as there were executions at the sheriff’s office binding the property, and notice of which was given me by the sheriff of Richland district.”

The motion for a new trial must fail.

Justices Colcock, Johnson and Richardson, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Todd v. Williamson, 12 S.C.L. 148 (S.C. 1821).

12 S.C.L. 148 (Todd v. Williamson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.