Todd v. Union Dime Savings Institution

New York Supreme Court

Todd v. Union Dime Savings Institution

14 N.Y.S. 937, 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 960, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2581

New York Supreme Court·Decided April 17, 1891·Published

Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.

Although I am of the same opinion which I expressed upon the first trial of this case, (20 Abb. N. C. 275,) and that the title in question is not such a one as a purchaser should be required to take, yet, as the court of appeals was of a different opinion, (118 N. Y. 337, 23 N. E. Rep. 299,) there remains nothing for the judge below to do but decide as he did, and we must affirm the judgment. The facts are substantially the same as on the previous trial, and the alleged errors in admitting evidence, even if they existed, could not affect the result. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Brunt, P. J.

Although I am of the same opinion which I expressed upon the first trial of this case, (20 Abb. N. C. 275,) and that the title in question is not such a one as a purchaser should be required to take, yet, as the court of appeals was of a different opinion, (118 N. Y. 337, 23 N. E. Rep. 299,) there remains nothing for the judge below to do but decide as he did, and we must affirm the judgment. The facts are substantially the same as on the previous trial, and the alleged errors in admitting evidence, even if they existed, could not affect the result. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Todd v. Union Dime Savings Institution, 14 N.Y.S. 937, 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 960, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2581 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

14 N.Y.S. 937 (Todd v. Union Dime Savings Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related