Todd v. Todd
This text of 16 Wis. 2d 635 (Todd v. Todd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court, after having made a finding that appellants’ counsel “had reasonable grounds” to believe he had a stipulation on the subject, abused its discretion in denying a motion under sec. 269.45 (2), Stats., for an enlargement of time to serve a proposed bill of exceptions. The justices are equally divided on this question and, accordingly, the order of the trial court is affirmed without further opinion. Brown Deer v. Milwaukee, ante, p. 206, 217, 114 N. W. (2d) 493; Hagenah v. Milwaukee E. R. & L. Co. (1908), 136 Wis. 300, 116 N. W. 843; Jacobs v. Queen Ins. Co. (1905), 123 Wis. 608, 612, 101 N. W. 1090.
Order affirmed.
[638a]*638aThe following opinion was filed October 2, 1962:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Wis. 2d 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-todd-wis-1962.