Todd v. Todd

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Todd v. Todd

103 A. 17, 78 N.H. 386, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 21

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided April 3, 1917·Published

Opinion

Young, J.

As there is no statute of this state or specific rule of the common law which provides that the personal estate of nonresident decedents shall be distributed in accordance with the laws of this state, the plaintiff should remit the amount with which he is charged on the settlement of his account to whoever may be appointed by the Canadian court to complete the administration of Adelaide’s estate.

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young, J.

As there is no statute of this state or specific rule of the common law which provides that the personal estate of nonresident decedents shall be distributed in accordance with the laws of this state, the plaintiff should remit the amount with which he is charged on the settlement of his account to whoever may be appointed by the Canadian court to complete the administration of Adelaide’s estate.

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Todd v. Todd, 103 A. 17, 78 N.H. 386, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 21 (N.H. 1917).

Pincite

103 A. 17 (Todd v. Todd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.