Todd v. Todd
This text of 152 S.W.2d 986 (Todd v. Todd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion op the Court by
Affirming.
*276 In her suit for divorce the plaintiff, Patsy Todd, filed a motion for an allowance pendente lite of maintenance and of support of a child born March 25, 1941. An order was entered March 27th directing the husband to pay physicians ’ bills and $25 for other expenses incident to his wife’s confinement and $5 in addition for maintenance of herself and baby.
The plaintiff appeals from that order, insisting that prima facie it is wholly insufficient. The allowance seems to be ridiculously low; but evidence was heard by the chancellor on the motion, and since a transcript of it has not been filed here, it is presumed conclusively that the evidence authorized the judgment. Brandenburg v. Brandenburg, 246 Ky. 546, 55 S. W. (2d) 351. The only question presented is whether the pleadings support the judgment. They do.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 S.W.2d 986, 287 Ky. 275, 1941 Ky. LEXIS 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-todd-kyctapphigh-1941.