Todd v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Todd v. State

1910 OK CR 91, 111 P. 1102, 3 Okla. Crim. 697, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 256

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 9, 1910

DocketNo. A-334.

StatusPublished

This text of 1910 OK CR 91 (Todd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Todd v. State, 1910 OK CR 91, 111 P. 1102, 3 Okla. Crim. 697, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 256 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUBIAM.

Plaintiff in error* H. A. Todd. -Jr., was convicted in the county court of Canadian county of-the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, and was on the 31st ,day of July,- 1909, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a term of sixty days and pay a fine of two hundred dollars. Eroin which judgment he appealed by filing in this court on September 39, 1909, his petition in error with case-made attached. No briefs have been filed and we are not advised as to what plaintiff in error relies upon for a reversal of said judgment. Counsel for the state has filed a motion to dismiss or affirm for want of prosecution. We have examined the record and no error is apparent. The motion to affirm is allowed and the judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed. The clerk of this court will issue mandate to the county court of Canadian county, directing said county court to cause the judgment and sentenced to be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUBIAM.

Plaintiff in error* H. A. Todd. -Jr., was convicted in the county court of Canadian county of-the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, and was on the 31st ,day of July,- 1909, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a term of sixty days and pay a fine of two hundred dollars. Eroin which judgment he appealed by filing in this court on September 39, 1909, his petition in error with case-made attached. No briefs have been filed and we are not advised as to what plaintiff in error relies upon for a reversal of said judgment. Counsel for the state has filed a motion to dismiss or affirm for want of prosecution. We have examined the record and no error is apparent. The motion to affirm is allowed and the judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed. The clerk of this court will issue mandate to the county court of Canadian county, directing said county court to cause the judgment and sentenced to be enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1910 OK CR 91, 111 P. 1102, 3 Okla. Crim. 697, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-state-oklacrimapp-1910.