Todd v. State
This text of 603 P.2d 1092 (Todd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
In these consolidated proceedings, appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to a term of life with the possibility of parole. Appellant’s motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence was denied. He appealed from the conviction and from the order denying his motion for new trial, alleging several grounds for reversal. We need only consider appellant’s contention that an oral instruction or admonition given by the court during the jury’s deliberations was coercive.
In the instant case, the complained of instruction was nearly identical to the instruction that we condemned as reversible error in Ransey v. State, 95 Nev. 364, 366-67, 594 P.2d 1157, 1158 (1979). See also Redeford v. State, 93 Nev. 649, 572 P.2d 219 (1977).
Accordingly, we reverse.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
603 P.2d 1092, 95 Nev. 909, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-state-nev-1979.