Todd v. State

603 P.2d 1092, 95 Nev. 909, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 693
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 20, 1979
DocketNos. 10760, 11488
StatusPublished

This text of 603 P.2d 1092 (Todd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Todd v. State, 603 P.2d 1092, 95 Nev. 909, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 693 (Neb. 1979).

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In these consolidated proceedings, appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to a term of life with the possibility of parole. Appellant’s motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence was denied. He appealed from the conviction and from the order denying his motion for new trial, alleging several grounds for reversal. We need only consider appellant’s contention that an oral instruction or admonition given by the court during the jury’s deliberations was coercive.

In the instant case, the complained of instruction was nearly identical to the instruction that we condemned as reversible error in Ransey v. State, 95 Nev. 364, 366-67, 594 P.2d 1157, 1158 (1979). See also Redeford v. State, 93 Nev. 649, 572 P.2d 219 (1977).

Accordingly, we reverse.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Redeford v. State
572 P.2d 219 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1977)
Ransey v. State
594 P.2d 1157 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
603 P.2d 1092, 95 Nev. 909, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-state-nev-1979.