Todd v. State

111 S.E. 85, 28 Ga. App. 215, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 398
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 14, 1922
Docket13094
StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 85 (Todd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Todd v. State, 111 S.E. 85, 28 Ga. App. 215, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 398 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the evidence and the defendant’s statement to the jury, the failure of the court to charge upon the law of involuntary manslaughter was not error.

2. The remaining grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial are without substantial merit.

3. The verdict was amply supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 85, 28 Ga. App. 215, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-state-gactapp-1922.