Todd v. State

19 So. 3d 1180, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15785, 2009 WL 3364886
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 21, 2009
Docket4D09-940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 So. 3d 1180 (Todd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Todd v. State, 19 So. 3d 1180, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15785, 2009 WL 3364886 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence as filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). As to appellant’s claim that mandatory minimum terms for his offenses could not be stacked, i.e., imposed consecutively, the sentencing transcript reveals, and the state concedes, that the trial court intended to impose only one 25-year mandatory minimum term. The mandatory minimum terms on the other counts are concurrent and not stacked. The total combined sentence was 50 years in prison with a 25-year mandatory minimum term. The Department of Corrections shall structure appellant’s sentence and calculate the release date accordingly.

GROSS, C.J., POLEN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Navarro v. State
19 So. 3d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 So. 3d 1180, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15785, 2009 WL 3364886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.