Todd v. State

19 So. 3d 1180, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15785, 2009 WL 3364886
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 21, 2009·No. 4D09-940·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence as filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). As to appellant’s claim that mandatory minimum terms for his offenses could not be stacked, i.e., imposed consecutively, the sentencing transcript reveals, and the state concedes, that the trial court intended to impose only one 25-year mandatory minimum term. The mandatory minimum terms on the other counts are concurrent and not stacked. The total combined sentence was 50 years in prison with a 25-year mandatory minimum term. The Department of Corrections shall structure appellant’s sentence and calculate the release date accordingly.

GROSS, C.J., POLEN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Todd v. State, 19 So. 3d 1180, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15785, 2009 WL 3364886 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

19 So. 3d 1180 (Todd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Navarro v. State
19 So. 3d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)