Todd v. State
This text of 19 So. 3d 1180 (Todd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence as filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). As to appellant’s claim that mandatory minimum terms for his offenses could not be stacked, i.e., imposed consecutively, the sentencing transcript reveals, and the state concedes, that the trial court intended to impose only one 25-year mandatory minimum term. The mandatory minimum terms on the other counts are concurrent and not stacked. The total combined sentence was 50 years in prison with a 25-year mandatory minimum term. The Department of Corrections shall structure appellant’s sentence and calculate the release date accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 So. 3d 1180, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15785, 2009 WL 3364886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.