Todd v. State

937 So. 2d 238, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14669, 2006 WL 2519545
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 1, 2006
DocketNo. 4D05-4120
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 937 So. 2d 238 (Todd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Todd v. State, 937 So. 2d 238, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14669, 2006 WL 2519545 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979). Affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, if appropriate.

POLEN, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kone, Inc. v. Robinson
937 So. 2d 238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
937 So. 2d 238, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14669, 2006 WL 2519545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.