Todd v. State

670 S.W.2d 454, 283 Ark. 142, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1739
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJuly 2, 1984
StatusPublished

This text of 670 S.W.2d 454 (Todd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Todd v. State, 670 S.W.2d 454, 283 Ark. 142, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1739 (Ark. 1984).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Brian Todd, by his attorney, Donald R. Huffman, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

The motion admits that the trial court’s order granting an extension of time was not timely filed and it was no fault of the appellant. His attorney admits that the order was filed late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases. 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 S.W.2d 454, 283 Ark. 142, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-state-ark-1984.