Todd v. State

38 So. 2d 615, 34 Ala. App. 272, 1949 Ala. App. LEXIS 370
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Todd v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Ala. App. 356
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 1, 1949·No. 8 Div. 732.·Published

Opinion

CÁRR, Judge.

This appeal is on the record proper without a transcription of the testimony. There is no error apparent, and the judgment of the court below is due to be affirmed.

The accused was adjudged guilty as-charged in the indictment, and his punishment was fixed at a fine of $100.

There is nothing in the record to. indicate that the defendant paid the fine and costs or confessed judgment therefor. Under these circumstances, the provisions of Section 341, Title 15, Code 1940, should have been applied. The judgment entry in. -this respect is incomplete.

It is ordered, therefore, that the judgment below be affirmed and the cause re *273 manded to the court below for proper sentence. Webb et al. v. State, Ala.App., 38 So.2d 500.

Affirmed. Remanded for proper sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Todd v. State, 38 So. 2d 615, 34 Ala. App. 272, 1949 Ala. App. LEXIS 370 (Ala. Ct. App. 1949).

38 So. 2d 615 (Todd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Webb v. State
38 So. 2d 500 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1949)