Todd v. Smathers
68 S.E.2d 783, 235 N.C. 123, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 324
This text of 68 S.E.2d 783 (Todd v. Smathers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Todd v. Smathers, 68 S.E.2d 783, 235 N.C. 123, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 324 (N.C. 1952).
Opinion
A motion for continuance is addressed to tbe discretion of tbe trial judge, and, in tbe absence of manifest abuse, bis ruling thereon is not reviewable. S. v. Parker, 234 N.C. 236, and cases cited.
And on tbe facts presented on this record, we are of opinion that no such abuse has been made to appear. Hence this appeal will be, and it is hereby
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
White v. Price
75 S.E.2d 244 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
68 S.E.2d 783, 235 N.C. 123, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-smathers-nc-1952.