Todd v. Smathers

68 S.E.2d 783, 235 N.C. 123, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 324
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 1, 1952·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PbR CuRiam.

A motion for continuance is addressed to tbe discretion of tbe trial judge, and, in tbe absence of manifest abuse, bis ruling thereon is not reviewable. S. v. Parker, 234 N.C. 236, and cases cited.

And on tbe facts presented on this record, we are of opinion that no such abuse has been made to appear. Hence this appeal will be, and it is hereby

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Todd v. Smathers, 68 S.E.2d 783, 235 N.C. 123, 1952 N.C. LEXIS 324 (N.C. 1952).

68 S.E.2d 783 (Todd v. Smathers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. Price
75 S.E.2d 244 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)