Todd v. Morse

1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 60
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 1, 1880
DocketNo. 6616
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 60 (Todd v. Morse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Todd v. Morse, 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 60 (La. 1880).

Opinion

Egan, J.

Plaintiffs and appellees move to dismiss this appeal because the amount in dispute is less than five hundred dollars. The amount sued for is thirty per cent of the balance due on a stock note and subscription of one thousand dollars to the Pelican Mutual Insurance Co. This balance is alleged by plaintiffs to be $622.54. As was said in the case of Peysleand v. Weber, 25 A. 133, it seems clear that before decreeing the defendant to pay the thirty per cent demanded now, it must be ascertained whether he is liable as a stockholder to the extent alleged in the petition. This amount exceeds five hundred dollars. The motion to dismiss must therefore be refused. Williams v. Vance, 2 A. 909, and V. S. & T. R. R. Co. v. Hamilton, 15 A. 521.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baizley v. The Brig Odorilla
15 A. 521 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-morse-la-1880.