Todd v. M'Culloch
This text of 3 Pen. & W. 444 (Todd v. M'Culloch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause was tried before the determination of Betz’s Appeal, 1 Penn, Rep. 271 by which it seems to have heen established, substantially if no.t in terms, that the lien of a judgment is preserved by an execution, only as regards the land leyied. Lands are chattels for payment of debts; and the lien by which they are tp be bound for more than the fiye years without a scire facias, seems to be that which the common law attributes to fin exfecutiqn rather than the lien of the judgment. At all events, it was there determined, that a levy of goods will not prolong the lien qs to Iqnd; and an the same principle a levy of ojher land can jxave no greater effect than the levy of any other chattel. The decision of the court belpw, is therefore not supported.
Judgment peyersed and a venire do. novo awarded,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Pen. & W. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-mculloch-pa-1832.