Todd v. Loomis

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Todd v. Loomis

152 N.W. 447, 161 Wis. 233, 1915 Wisc. LEXIS 196

DecidedOctober 5, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 152 N.W. 447 (Todd v. Loomis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Todd v. Loomis, 152 N.W. 447, 161 Wis. 233, 1915 Wisc. LEXIS 196 (Wis. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

The following opinion was filed May 4, 1915:

Marshall, J.

Notwithstanding counsel for appellant discussed at considerable length in his brief and oral argument several legal propositions, the cause below turned on [236]*236the facts. There was no controversy there and there is none here respecting any principle of law.

It follows that the real purpose of this appeal is to impeach the findings of the trial court respecting the appellant’s allegations of matters of fact. On that we axe unable to see our way clear to disturb the decision below. The findings are all against appellant’s claims of fraud and unfair conduct and on sufficient evidence to preclude disturbing them. The findings also amply warranted the conclusion that appellant had too long slept upon his claim for redress to be entitled to the favor of equity.

By the Court. — The judgment is affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on October 5, 1915.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The following opinion was filed May 4, 1915:

Marshall, J.

Notwithstanding counsel for appellant discussed at considerable length in his brief and oral argument several legal propositions, the cause below turned on [236]*236the facts. There was no controversy there and there is none here respecting any principle of law.

It follows that the real purpose of this appeal is to impeach the findings of the trial court respecting the appellant’s allegations of matters of fact. On that we axe unable to see our way clear to disturb the decision below. The findings are all against appellant’s claims of fraud and unfair conduct and on sufficient evidence to preclude disturbing them. The findings also amply warranted the conclusion that appellant had too long slept upon his claim for redress to be entitled to the favor of equity.

By the Court. — The judgment is affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on October 5, 1915.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 N.W. 447, 161 Wis. 233, 1915 Wisc. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-loomis-wis-1915.