Todd v. Llewellyn

Fourth Circuit

Todd v. Llewellyn

46 F. App'x 172

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2002·No. No. 02-7068·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rick Todd appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his action filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Todd v. Llewellyn, No. CA-02-313 (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2002). We deny Todd’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rick Todd appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his action filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Todd v. Llewellyn, No. CA-02-313 (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2002). We deny Todd’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Todd v. Llewellyn, 46 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

46 F. App'x 172 (Todd v. Llewellyn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related