Todd v. Knowlin

Fourth Circuit

Todd v. Knowlin

325 F. App'x 197

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 11, 2009

DocketNo. 08-8470

StatusPublished

This text of 325 F. App'x 197 (Todd v. Knowlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Todd v. Knowlin, 325 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Allen Todd appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Todd v. Knowlin, No. 9:07-cv-03990-GRA, 2008 WL 4817004 (D.S.C. Nov. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Allen Todd appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Todd v. Knowlin, No. 9:07-cv-03990-GRA, 2008 WL 4817004 (D.S.C. Nov. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

325 F. App'x 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-knowlin-ca4-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack