Todd v. Keator

177 A.D. 112, 163 N.Y.S. 853, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5221
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 7, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 177 A.D. 112 (Todd v. Keator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Todd v. Keator, 177 A.D. 112, 163 N.Y.S. 853, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinions

Woodward, J.:

The defendant has demurred to the complaint upon the grounds (1) that the plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue, in that it appears upon the face of the .complaint that the cause of action alleged, if any, is vested in an organization known as Camp No. 2 of the Order of the Golden Seal, and upon the further ground that the plaintiff is not a member of said Order of the Golden Seal, and (2) that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer, which is to the amended complaint, has been overruled, and the defendant appeals from the order.

Under the liberal rules now in vogue in reference to pleadings it is conceded on the part of the defendant that if any cause of action may be spelled out of the allegations of fact contained in the complaint the order should prevail, but it is insisted that under this rule the complaint is fatally defective under both suggestions of the demurrer. The original complaint was held defective upon demurrer, on the ground that the defendant, having lawfully come into possession of the funds, it was necessary to allege a demand and a refusal in order to make the holding wrongful, and the amended complaint is identical with •the original complaint, with the exception that it is now alleged, not that a demand was made prior to the commencement of the action, but that ‘ plaintiff on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated has demanded the said sum of money heretofore mentioned from the defendant, but no part has been paid to this plaintiff or any other person similarly situated as plaintiff is informed and believes, to their great damage.” We will pass over the question of whether such an allegation is sufficient to overcome the original defect in the pleading, and look into the complaint to determine whether the plaintiff is entitled to maintain this action. Disregarding the order of the plaintiff’s allegations, and for an understanding of the case, we [114]*114present the essential allegations of fact which may be said to be admitted for the purposes of the demurrer.

It is alleged that the Superintendent of Insurance on the 11th day of March, 1902, issued a final certificate of authority to The Order of the Golden Seal,” by which it was duly authorized to transact business, and that said order was duly constituted a body politic and corporate with the powers and privileges of a fraternal, beneficiary society, order or association; that thereafter said Order of the Golden Seal adopted a constitution and by-laws to govern the same; that article 3, section 1, of said constitution provided that local camps shall consist of at least fifteen members who have been duly elected and initiated according to the ritual of the order, and none except such shall be allowed a voice or vote in its meetings; that section 2 of the same article provided that camps are to be organized by the supreme organizer or by his authority, and no additional camp shall be organized in a place where one exists without his consent; that section 4 of the same article provides that members of the respective camps shall elect officers for their own government and hold meetings for the transaction of business in accordance with the by-laws, and shall be governed as the constitution prescribes; that by-law 37 provided that quarterly dues shall be paid by each member holding a certificate upon the cash dividend plan to the camp to which he belongs, and shall not be less than fifty cents per quarter, or two dollars per annum; such quarterly dues shall be paid to the local secretary, and one half thereof shall be retained by such local secretary in full payment for his services in performing the duties of his office and the balance thereof shall be paid by such local secretary to the treasurer of his local camp; that subsequent to the issuing of the certificate of authority by the Superintendent of Insurance, it appeared upon the policies issued that certain policyholders were members of Camp No. 2, Order of the Golden Seal, and that Joel L. Keator was local secretary, and further that no local camp, as provided by the by-laws and the constitution of said order, was ever kept or maintained by said Joel L. Keator, the local secretary of said Camp No. 2; that no officers were ever elected and that no meetings of said Camp No. 2 were ever held or policyholders were ever initi[115]*115ated as required by the constitution and by-laws of said order, by said Joel L. Keator, local secretary of Camp No. 2, Order of the Golden Seal, at Griffin Corners, N. Y.; that the defendant Joel L. Keator was one of the organizers of said corporation, Order of the Golden Seal, and was and is now one of the officers thereof; that after the organization of said Order of the Golden Seal a great number of persons, at least 400, of which Augustus H. Todd was one, became members of said order and policyholders thereof, and it appeared on said policies that they were members of Camp No. 2, located at Griffin Corners, N. Y., and paid their monthly dues and the quarterly dues on said policies to said Joel L. Keator, local secretary, as appeared from the policy; that the quarterly dues paid by each policyholder was the sum of fifty cents per quarter or two dollars per annum; that said Joel L. Keator was entitled under the term of by-law No. 37 to'the sum of twenty-five cents per quarter, or one dollar per annum, as local secretary, on each' policyholder for his services out of said payment of two dollars per annum on each policyholder; that said sum of two dollars per annum was collected by said defendant Joel L. Keator from each policyholder for a number of years; that the sum of one dollar of said payment of two dollars per annum on each policyholder was the property of local Camp No. 2 and should have been paid over by this defendant Joel L. Keator to the treasurer of said local camp; that no camp- was maintained as hereinbefore set forth, and the dues of one dollar each year for each policyholder was not paid over by this defendant for the benefit of said local camp, but was retained and converted to his own use by said Joel L. Keator, this defendant, the local secretary of Camp No. 2, Order of the Golden Seal, and not paid over to the local Camp No. 2 aforesaid, its rightful owner; that by reason of said Joel L. Keator, this defendant, not organizing and maintaining a local camp, as required by the constitution and by-laws of the Order of the Golden Seal, the policyholders in said order who were called members of Camp No. 2 were deprived of many of the rights and privileges which they were entitled to as such policyholders; that said defendant Joel L. Keator, local secretary of said Camp No. 2, not having maintained said [116]*116camp, as required by the constitution and by-laws of said order, the money that belonged to said camp should be distributed among the respective members thereof pro rata as to the amount that each has paid to said Joel L. Keator, as local secretary, and not paid over by him as required by the by-laws of the order; that said defendant Joel L. Keator has no legal or equitable right to said sums of money so paid to him as aforesaid; that by reason of the facts aforesaid and the retention of said sum of one dollar each year on each policyholder of said Camp No. 2, for a number of years, a large sum of money is now in the hands of said Joel L. Keator, which belongs to •the members past and present of said local Camp No. 2, Order of the Golden Seal; as the number of the policyholders is so large and the time that they have been paying dues as aforesaid is unknown to this plaintiff, he cannot state the exact amount of money that is now in the hands of said Joel L.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Graham v. Buffalo General Laundries Corp.
235 A.D. 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 A.D. 112, 163 N.Y.S. 853, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-keator-nyappdiv-1917.