Todd v. Holt & Vereen Construction Co.

281 S.E.2d 215, 276 S.C. 615, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 451
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedAugust 4, 1981
Docket21540
StatusPublished

This text of 281 S.E.2d 215 (Todd v. Holt & Vereen Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Todd v. Holt & Vereen Construction Co., 281 S.E.2d 215, 276 S.C. 615, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 451 (S.C. 1981).

Opinion

Gregory, Justice:

This appeal is from an order of the circuit court reversing a lump sum award by the South Carolina Industrial Commission. We affirm and remand for further proceedings on another issue.

Appellant Marvin Todd, now deceased, was found by the Commission to have a fifty percent incapacity of the back and was awarded Sixty Three Dollars ($63.00) per week during his disability. Appellant thereafter applied to the Commission for lump sum payment in lieu of the weekly receipts. He died nine days later from causes unrelated to [616]*616the- proceedings before the Commission. Holding the lump sum to be a vested right to which appellant’s estate was entitled, the Commission granted the application. The court below reversed.

It is conceded no notice to respondents Holt & Ve-reen Construction Company, appellant’s employer, and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, the carrier, of the application for lump sum payments preceded the award. An order for lump sum payment cannot be made without notice to the employer and carrier, who are entitled to be heard on the issue. Ashley v. Ware Shoals Manufacturing Company, 210 S. C. 273, 42 S. E. (2d) 390 (1947). The court below therefore properly held the award of lump sum payment to appellant null and void.

Appellant also raises on appeal the question whether the payments under the original award of weekly payments are a vested right and therefore payable to the estate. That issue was not addressed by the Commission or the court below. The case is accordingly remanded to the Commission for findings of fact on this issue. See Cooper v. McDevitt & Street Company, 260 S. C. 463, 196 S. E. (2d) 833 (1973).

Affirmed and remanded.

Lewis, C. J., and Littlejohn, Ness and Harwell, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cooper v. McDevitt & Street Co.
196 S.E.2d 833 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1973)
Ashley v. Ware Shoals Mfg. Co.
42 S.E.2d 390 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 S.E.2d 215, 276 S.C. 615, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-holt-vereen-construction-co-sc-1981.