Todd v. Fidelity & Casualty Co of New York
Opinion
OPINION
This is an appeal on questions of law in an action for money only brought by George M. Todd against the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York. Issue was joined and on trial to a jury, at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant company moved for a directed verdict in its favor, which motion was overruled. Thereupon, the defendant rested, and both sides rested, and the following proceedings appear in the record:
“By Mr. Campbell: The defendant renews its motion for a directed verdict.
“By the Court: Overruled.
“By Mr. James: Just a minute.
“By Mr. Campbell': Exception.
“By Mr. James: The plaintiff now moves for a directed verdict on the evidence.
“By Mr. Campbell: I want to know what the court holds the record is now?
“By the Court: The court will hold that they are double motions.
“By Mr. Campbell: Now pending before the court?
“By the Court: Yes.
“By Mr. Campbell: The defendant withdraws his.
“By Mr. James: Our motion will stand.
“By the Court: I will grant your motion.
“By Mr. Campbell: Exception.”
Thereupon the court directed the jury to return a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount determined by the court to be due the plaintiff.
Clearly, when the defendant withdrew its motion, which it had a right to withdraw after the court ruled that both motions were pending, there remained only the plaintiff’s motion pending and the jury could not be discharged from a consideration of the facts, there being fact issues presented by the evidence. P., C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v Luthy, 112 Oh St 321, 147 NE 336; Need v Hershman, 103 Oh St 13, 132 NE 19, 18 A.L.R. 1419.
*621 *620 The defendant’s withdrawal of its mo *621 tion for a directed verdict was tantamount to a request to submit the case to the jury, and failure to so submit it was prejudicial error requiring a reversal. Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
10 N.E.2d 184 (Todd v. Fidelity & Casualty Co of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.