Todd v. Director of Revenue

342 S.W.3d 367, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 770, 2011 WL 2206731
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 2011·No. ED 94798·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Todd appeals the judgment in favor of the Director of Revenue, State of Missouri (“DOR”) on Todd’s petition for review of the revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to section 577.041 RSMo Supp.2009. We find that the trial court did not err in its judgment in favor of the DOR.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Todd v. Director of Revenue, 342 S.W.3d 367, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 770, 2011 WL 2206731 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

342 S.W.3d 367 (Todd v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Johnson
342 S.W.3d 367 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)