Todd v. Carter

1914 OK 377, 142 P. 996, 43 Okla. 238, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 499
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedAugust 18, 1914
Docket6239
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1914 OK 377 (Todd v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Todd v. Carter, 1914 OK 377, 142 P. 996, 43 Okla. 238, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 499 (Okla. 1914).

Opinion

BLEAKMORE, J.

The questions involved herein arise on motion of defendants in error to dismiss this proceeding.

*239 The only assignments of error relied upon by the plaintiffs in error for reversal of the cause are errors alleged to have occurred at the trial.

Motion for new trial being overruled on November 6, 1913, plaintiffs were allowed 90 days within which to make and serve a case-made. Within the time, on January 27th .following, plaintiffs procured an extension of 30 days’ time from January 28, 1914, within which to make and serve said case-made. The case-made was not served until the 29th day of February, 1914, which was after the expiration of the time granted. The case-made is a nullity. Saxon v. Hardin, 29 Okla. 17, 118 Pac. 264.

There being no questions presented by the record which can be considered in this court, the appeal is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. Dillingham
1914 OK 490 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1914 OK 377, 142 P. 996, 43 Okla. 238, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-v-carter-okla-1914.