Todd Steckelberg v. Brad Rice

Eighth Circuit

Todd Steckelberg v. Brad Rice

878 F.3d 630

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 26, 2017

Docket17-1823

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 878 F.3d 630 (Todd Steckelberg v. Brad Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Todd Steckelberg v. Brad Rice, 878 F.3d 630 (8th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The district court 1 dismissed Todd Steckelberg’s complaints ■ for failure to state a claim. Steckelberg v. Rice, 184 F.Supp.3d 746, 759 (D. Neb. 2016), incorporated in Order, No. 4:15-CV-3069 (D. Neb. Mar. 24, 2017) (Doc. No. 23). He appeals. After reviewing the record and arguments for reversal, this court concludes that dismissal was proper. See Kruger v. Nebraska, 820 F.3d 295, 301 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review). As the district court ruled in its thorough and well-reasoned opinions, the complaints fail to state a claim under federal or Nebraska law: See Steckelberg, 184 F.Supp.3d at 754-59 and Order at 2-5, discussing U.S Const, amends. I, XIV; 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(2); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-217; Neb. Const, art. XV, § 13. Further discussion would have no precedential value. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The district court 1 dismissed Todd Steckelberg’s complaints ■ for failure to state a claim. Steckelberg v. Rice, 184 F.Supp.3d 746, 759 (D. Neb. 2016), incorporated in Order, No. 4:15-CV-3069 (D. Neb. Mar. 24, 2017) (Doc. No. 23). He appeals. After reviewing the record and arguments for reversal, this court concludes that dismissal was proper. See Kruger v. Nebraska, 820 F.3d 295, 301 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review). As the district court ruled in its thorough and well-reasoned opinions, the complaints fail to state a claim under federal or Nebraska law: See Steckelberg, 184 F.Supp.3d at 754-59 and Order at 2-5, discussing U.S Const, amends. I, XIV; 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(2); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-217; Neb. Const, art. XV, § 13. Further discussion would have no precedential value. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

878 F.3d 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-steckelberg-v-brad-rice-ca8-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack