Todd Rochow v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Todd Rochow v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.. Read the opinion of the Court — 737 F.3d 415
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 19, 2014·No. 12-2074·Unknown

Opinion

No. 12-2074

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Feb 19, 2014 TODD R. ROCHOW AND JOHN ROCHOW, ) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE ) OF DANIEL J. ROCHOW, ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellees, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, ) ) Defendant-Appellant. ) )

BEFORE: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; BOGGS, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK, McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of

this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is

vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Todd Rochow v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., (6th Cir. 2014).

Todd Rochow v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am. (Todd Rochow v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.