Todd Heath v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Todd Heath v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 F.4th 654
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided January 16, 2024·No. 22-1515·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

January 16, 2024

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

JOHN Z. LEE, Circuit Judge

No. 22-1515

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appeal from the United States District ex rel. TODD HEATH, Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Relator-Appellant,

v. No. 2:08-cv-00724-LA

WISCONSIN BELL, INC., Lynn Adelman, Defendant-Appellee. Judge.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendant-Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc filed on August 30, 2023 and Relator-Appellant’s answer filed on October 4, 2023, no judge in active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. * The petition for rehearing en banc is therefore DENIED. To the extent the petition sought panel rehearing, the petition is GRANTED to the extent that the panel is issuing the attached amended opinion, which includes an entirely new discussion of the federal funds issue.

* Judge Rovner and Judge Kirsch did not participate in the consideration of the petition for

rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Todd Heath v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc., (7th Cir. 2024).

Todd Heath v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc. (Todd Heath v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.