Todd Heath v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc.
This text of Todd Heath v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc. (Todd Heath v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604
January 16, 2024
Before
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge
DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge
JOHN Z. LEE, Circuit Judge
No. 22-1515
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appeal from the United States District ex rel. TODD HEATH, Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Relator-Appellant,
v. No. 2:08-cv-00724-LA
WISCONSIN BELL, INC., Lynn Adelman, Defendant-Appellee. Judge.
ORDER
Upon consideration of Defendant-Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc filed on August 30, 2023 and Relator-Appellant’s answer filed on October 4, 2023, no judge in active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. * The petition for rehearing en banc is therefore DENIED. To the extent the petition sought panel rehearing, the petition is GRANTED to the extent that the panel is issuing the attached amended opinion, which includes an entirely new discussion of the federal funds issue.
* Judge Rovner and Judge Kirsch did not participate in the consideration of the petition for
rehearing en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Todd Heath v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/todd-heath-v-wisconsin-bell-inc-ca7-2024.