Todd D. Daniels, Sr. v. City of Detroit, et al.

District Court, E.D. Michigan·Decided January 15, 2026·No. 4:25-cv-11261·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

TODD D. DANIELS, SR., Case No. 25-11261

Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm v. United States District Judge

CITY OF DETROIT, et al., Elizabeth A. Stafford United States Magistrate Defendants. Judge ___________________________ /

OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S OCTOBER 22, 2025 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 53) AND DECEMBER 5, 2025 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 66)

Currently before the court is Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford’s October 22, 2025 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 53) and her December 5, 2025 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 66). Magistrate Judge Stafford recommends denying Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 52) and motion for default, default judgment, and injunctive relief (ECF No. 62). The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The court nevertheless agrees

with the Magistrate Judge’s recommended disposition. Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Reports and Recommendations (ECF Nos. 53 and 66) and DENIES Plaintiff’s motions (ECF Nos. 52, 62).

SO ORDERED. Date: January 15, 2026 s/F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Todd D. Daniels, Sr. v. City of Detroit, et al., (E.D. Mich. 2026).

Todd D. Daniels, Sr. v. City of Detroit, et al. (Todd D. Daniels, Sr. v. City of Detroit, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)