Tod v. Steamboat Sultana
This text of 60 U.S. 362 (Tod v. Steamboat Sultana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the northern district of New York, in admiralty.
The lihel was filed by the appellants in the court below, to recover for supplies furnished the steamboat Sultana, at Cleveland, in the State of Ohio. The supplies furnished were coal, which, according to the account current, began in April, 1853, and continued from time to time till April, 1854.
The defence set up was the mortgage which has been referred to in the case of Pratt and others v. Reed, just decided. There was also a second ground of defence; which it is not material to notice. The District Court decreed in favor of the defendants, except, as it respects some five hundred dollars, which item has not been appealed from. The Circuit Court affirmed the decree.
The case falls within the principles stated in that above referred to, and which determined that the mortgagees wei’e entitled to the proceeds of the vessel in the registry. This was the result of the decision of the court below, and the decree is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 U.S. 362, 15 L. Ed. 662, 19 How. 362, 1856 U.S. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tod-v-steamboat-sultana-scotus-1857.