Tod Houthoofd v. Oaks Correctional Facility Warden
This text of Tod Houthoofd v. Oaks Correctional Facility Warden (Tod Houthoofd v. Oaks Correctional Facility Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
October 27, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
160965(23) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra TOD HOUTHOOFD, Richard H. Bernstein Petitioner-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 160965 COA: 351654 OAKS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WARDEN, Respondent-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 28, 2020 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 27, 2020 b1019 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tod Houthoofd v. Oaks Correctional Facility Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tod-houthoofd-v-oaks-correctional-facility-warden-mich-2020.