Toby v. State
917 So. 2d 309, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20142, 2005 WL 3487869
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 2005·No. No. 1D05-3926·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The lower court found appellant guilty of direct criminal contempt without first affording appellant an opportunity to present excusing or mitigating circumstances, as is required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. Because the trial court did not strictly comply with the provisions of Rule 3.830, we reverse without prejudice to the institution of proper contempt proceedings. See Garrett v. State, 876 So.2d 24, 25-26 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Toby v. State, 917 So. 2d 309, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20142, 2005 WL 3487869 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
917 So. 2d 309 (Toby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. State
917 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)