Toby v. Heidenheimer
This text of 1 White & W. 439 (Toby v. Heidenheimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
§ 795. Charge of the court; need not be in writing. The provisions of the statute with reference to the charge of the court [R. S. 1316 et seq.] are directory merely, and a verbal charge given by the judge to the jury is not of itself such error as will necessarily cause a reversal of the judgment. It must be shown that the charge was in itself erroneous. [Reid v. Reid, 11 Tex. 585; Chapman v. Sneed, 17 Tex. 428.] The cases cited, although arising under a former statute, are equally applicable to the provisions of the Revised Statutes above cited.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 White & W. 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toby-v-heidenheimer-texapp-1881.