Tobol v. Colvin

Fourth Circuit

Tobol v. Colvin

565 F. App'x 269

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 10, 2014·No. No. 13-2213·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey J. Tobol appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommenda-

[270] tion of the magistrate judge and upholding the Commissioner’s decision denying Tobol’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tobol v. Colvin, No. 1:12-cv-00171-GCM-DCK, 2013 WL 5302562 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2013). We. dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey J. Tobol appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommenda-

[270] tion of the magistrate judge and upholding the Commissioner’s decision denying Tobol’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tobol v. Colvin, No. 1:12-cv-00171-GCM-DCK, 2013 WL 5302562 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2013). We. dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Tobol v. Colvin, 565 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

565 F. App'x 269 (Tobol v. Colvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.