Tobler v. State

239 So. 3d 796
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 6, 2018·No. Case No. 5D18–80·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

AFFIRMED. We reject Appellant's argument that the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act is unconstitutional because it allows the judge, rather than the jury, to determine whether a defendant qualifies as a prison releasee reoffender for sentencing purposes. See Chapa v. State , 159 So.3d 361, 362 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ; Lopez v. State , 135 So.3d 539, 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

COHEN, C.J., TORPY, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tobler v. State, 239 So. 3d 796 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

239 So. 3d 796 (Tobler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
M.D. Florida, 2026
Jesse David Hicks v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Marco T. Denson v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
RICKY RYLAND v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023
HEATHCLIFF PETERS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
JAMES C. SMITH vs STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
MARK WASHINGTON v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
Hood v. State
264 So. 3d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)