Tobler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tobler v. State

303 So. 2d 371

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 19, 1974

DocketNo. 73-1196

StatusPublished

This text of 303 So. 2d 371 (Tobler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tobler v. State, 303 So. 2d 371 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion pursuant to rule 3.8S0, CrPR, to vacate judgment and sentence. The judgment was entered upon a plea of guilty. Appellant alleges in his motion that the plea was entered upon a promise that he would receive an examination by a psychiatrist and a further examination to determine whether he was suffering from brain damage. The purpose of the examination was to determine appellant’s mental capacity at the' time of the criminal acts as well as at the time of the trial.

The State confesses that the examinations were never ordered or performed. The record supports this confession of error.

The cause is remanded with directions to' grant appellant’s motion and to set aside the guilty plea and for such further proceedings as may be proper under law. See Pope v. State, 56 Fla. 81, 47 So. 487 (1908) and Hill v. State, Fla.App. 1959, 110 So.2d 464.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion pursuant to rule 3.8S0, CrPR, to vacate judgment and sentence. The judgment was entered upon a plea of guilty. Appellant alleges in his motion that the plea was entered upon a promise that he would receive an examination by a psychiatrist and a further examination to determine whether he was suffering from brain damage. The purpose of the examination was to determine appellant’s mental capacity at the' time of the criminal acts as well as at the time of the trial.

The State confesses that the examinations were never ordered or performed. The record supports this confession of error.

The cause is remanded with directions to' grant appellant’s motion and to set aside the guilty plea and for such further proceedings as may be proper under law. See Pope v. State, 56 Fla. 81, 47 So. 487 (1908) and Hill v. State, Fla.App. 1959, 110 So.2d 464.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 So. 2d 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tobler-v-state-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack