Tobin v. Syfrit

Superior Court of Delaware

Tobin v. Syfrit

122 A. 244, 32 Del. 274, 2 W.W. Harr. 274, 1923 Del. LEXIS 26

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware

DecidedApril 4, 1923

DocketNo. 186

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 122 A. 244 (Tobin v. Syfrit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tobin v. Syfrit, 122 A. 244, 32 Del. 274, 2 W.W. Harr. 274, 1923 Del. LEXIS 26 (Del. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Richards, J.,

in charging the jury, among other things, said: Where one person lends an automobile or vehicle to another to be used by him at his pleasure, the borrower becomes a bailee and is in no sense a servant of the owner; he is responsible to the bailor, or owner, for the reasonable use of the property borrowed, and to third persons for the negligence of himself or his servants while said property is in his care and control, but the negligence of the borrower or bailee is not attributable to the bailor or owner of the property and can in no way prevent him from recovery for damages to his property caused by the negligence of a third person. Lloyd v. Railroad, 107 Wash. 57, 181 Pac. 29, 6 A. L. R. 307, and notes page 316; Railway Co. v. Railroad Co., 61 N. J. Law 287, 41 Atl. 1116; 3 R. C. L., p. 146, § 70; 1 Thompson on Neg., §§ 499 and 512.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richards, J.,

in charging the jury, among other things, said: Where one person lends an automobile or vehicle to another to be used by him at his pleasure, the borrower becomes a bailee and is in no sense a servant of the owner; he is responsible to the bailor, or owner, for the reasonable use of the property borrowed, and to third persons for the negligence of himself or his servants while said property is in his care and control, but the negligence of the borrower or bailee is not attributable to the bailor or owner of the property and can in no way prevent him from recovery for damages to his property caused by the negligence of a third person. Lloyd v. Railroad, 107 Wash. 57, 181 Pac. 29, 6 A. L. R. 307, and notes page 316; Railway Co. v. Railroad Co., 61 N. J. Law 287, 41 Atl. 1116; 3 R. C. L., p. 146, § 70; 1 Thompson on Neg., §§ 499 and 512.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 A. 244, 32 Del. 274, 2 W.W. Harr. 274, 1923 Del. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tobin-v-syfrit-delsuperct-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack