Tobin v. Sunshine State Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tobin v. Sunshine State Insurance

777 So. 2d 1207, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1819, 2001 WL 166834

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 21, 2001

DocketNo. 3D00-1201

StatusPublished

This text of 777 So. 2d 1207 (Tobin v. Sunshine State Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tobin v. Sunshine State Insurance, 777 So. 2d 1207, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1819, 2001 WL 166834 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the insurance company did not actively participate in the lawsuit or take any action inconsistent with its contractual right to appraisal, we affirm the trial court’s order granting the motion to stay proceedings and compel appraisal. See Gonzalez v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 25 Fla. L. Weekly D2614, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 1671415 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Hill v. Ray Carter Auto Sales, Inc., 745 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); ARI Mutual Ins. Co. v. Hogen, 734 So.2d 574 (Fla. [1208]*12083d DCA 1999); Gray Mart, Inc. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 703 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Lapidus v. Arlen Beach Condominium Ass’n, Inc., 394 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Further, we find that the remaining issue raised by the insureds lacks merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the insurance company did not actively participate in the lawsuit or take any action inconsistent with its contractual right to appraisal, we affirm the trial court’s order granting the motion to stay proceedings and compel appraisal. See Gonzalez v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 25 Fla. L. Weekly D2614, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 1671415 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Hill v. Ray Carter Auto Sales, Inc., 745 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); ARI Mutual Ins. Co. v. Hogen, 734 So.2d 574 (Fla. [1208]*12083d DCA 1999); Gray Mart, Inc. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 703 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Lapidus v. Arlen Beach Condominium Ass’n, Inc., 394 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Further, we find that the remaining issue raised by the insureds lacks merit.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

777 So. 2d 1207, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1819, 2001 WL 166834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tobin-v-sunshine-state-insurance-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack