Tobin v. Cary

41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 431
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 431 (Tobin v. Cary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tobin v. Cary, 41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 431 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1885).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The only question submitted in this case is whether the court had power to allow the amendment by an acknowledgment nwno pro tuno of the consent of a guardian to his appointment as such. We are of opinion that under section 723 of the Code of Civil Procedure that that power exists, and that the order of the court, as duly executed by the amendment of the record by inserting the acknowledgment, removed all objections to its validity.

There should be judgment in favor of Tobin requiring the purchasers Cary & Roth to perfect their purchase. By the stipulation in the case no costs are to be awarded.

Present — Davis, P. J., Beady and- DaNiels, JJ.

Judgment ordered for plaintiff on case submitted, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tobin-v-cary-nysupct-1885.