Tobias v. Celler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tobias v. Celler

268 A.D. 832, 50 N.Y.S.2d 178, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3660

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 1944·Published

Opinion

Order denying defendants’ motion to strike out plaintiffs’ second amended complaint on the ground that it was unauthorised under the resettled order of this court (267 App. Div. 884) [833] or for other relief, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ . concur. [180 Misc. 421; post, p. 884.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendants’ motion to strike out plaintiffs’ second amended complaint on the ground that it was unauthorised under the resettled order of this court (267 App. Div. 884) [833] or for other relief, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ . concur. [180 Misc. 421; post, p. 884.]

Tobias v. Celler, 268 A.D. 832, 50 N.Y.S.2d 178, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

268 A.D. 832 (Tobias v. Celler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related