Tobia v. Johns

Michigan Court of Appeals

Tobia v. Johns

167 N.W.2d 778, 16 Mich. App. 324, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1380

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 28, 1969

DocketDocket No. 4,953

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 167 N.W.2d 778 (Tobia v. Johns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tobia v. Johns, 167 N.W.2d 778, 16 Mich. App. 324, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1380 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs brought suit praying that a quit claim deed dated December 29, 1958, from plaintiffs to defendants be set aside, for an accounting, and for other relief.

Plaintiffs alleged that their signatures on the deed were procured by the fraud of defendant Johnnie Johns. They alleged that' an oral partnership agreement existed between themselves and defendant Johns for the purpose of developing the property involved, and that Johns had misrepresented the deed and other documents as “assignments” necessary in furtherance of their agreement.

The court below entered a judgment of no cause of action after a trial without a jury. The trial judge was of the opinion that the plaintiffs had failed to sustain the burden of proof of their allegations.

“Cases involving equity jurisdiction are reviewed in this court de novo, but ordinarily the court will not reverse the lower court where there is evidence and testimony to support the finding of the lower court unless justice demands or the evidence clearly preponderates the other way. Primarily, this is because the trial court is in better position to determine the credibility of witnesses by observing their conduct and demeanor in court, an opportunity which the reviewing court on appeal obviously does not have.” Osius v. Dingell, 375 Mich 605, 611, 612.

A review of the evidence in this case convinces this Court that had it sat as the trier of the facts, it would have reached the same result as did the trial court.

Affirmed, with costs to defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs brought suit praying that a quit claim deed dated December 29, 1958, from plaintiffs to defendants be set aside, for an accounting, and for other relief.

Plaintiffs alleged that their signatures on the deed were procured by the fraud of defendant Johnnie Johns. They alleged that' an oral partnership agreement existed between themselves and defendant Johns for the purpose of developing the property involved, and that Johns had misrepresented the deed and other documents as “assignments” necessary in furtherance of their agreement.

The court below entered a judgment of no cause of action after a trial without a jury. The trial judge was of the opinion that the plaintiffs had failed to sustain the burden of proof of their allegations.

“Cases involving equity jurisdiction are reviewed in this court de novo, but ordinarily the court will not reverse the lower court where there is evidence and testimony to support the finding of the lower court unless justice demands or the evidence clearly preponderates the other way. Primarily, this is because the trial court is in better position to determine the credibility of witnesses by observing their conduct and demeanor in court, an opportunity which the reviewing court on appeal obviously does not have.” Osius v. Dingell, 375 Mich 605, 611, 612.

A review of the evidence in this case convinces this Court that had it sat as the trier of the facts, it would have reached the same result as did the trial court.

Affirmed, with costs to defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 N.W.2d 778, 16 Mich. App. 324, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tobia-v-johns-michctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack