Tobey v. Keiter, Stephens, Hurst, Gary & Shreaves
This text of 585 F. App'x 837 (Tobey v. Keiter, Stephens, Hurst, Gary & Shreaves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Robert L. Tobey appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees on his claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss his state law breach of contract claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tobey v. Keiter, Stephens, Hurst, Gray & Shreaves, No. 3:13-cv-00315-JRS (E.D.Va. Aug. 13, 2013, 2013 WL 4101879; Jan. 7, 2014, 2014 WL 61325). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
585 F. App'x 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tobey-v-keiter-stephens-hurst-gary-shreaves-ca4-2014.