Toan v. Village of Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Toan v. Village of Perry

269 A.D. 894, 56 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4347

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1945

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 A.D. 894 (Toan v. Village of Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toan v. Village of Perry, 269 A.D. 894, 56 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to either party, report of Official Referee confirmed, and order granted for the relief prayed for in the petition, without costs. Memorandum: The evidence establishes the sufficiency of the water supply and that petitioner can be supplied without danger or harm to the residents of the Village of Perry. Under those circumstances the refusal to serve petitioner was arbitrary. (Village Law, § 224; People ex rel. Hilliker v. Pierce, 64 Misc. 627; Matter of Dexter Sulphite Pulp & P. Co. v. Shaver, 183 Misc. 275.) All concur, except Taylor, P. J., and Harris, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The order dismisses petitioner’s application for a mandamus order to compel defendant to furnish to petitioner water for irrigation purposes.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, McCurn and Love, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to either party, report of Official Referee confirmed, and order granted for the relief prayed for in the petition, without costs. Memorandum: The evidence establishes the sufficiency of the water supply and that petitioner can be supplied without danger or harm to the residents of the Village of Perry. Under those circumstances the refusal to serve petitioner was arbitrary. (Village Law, § 224; People ex rel. Hilliker v. Pierce, 64 Misc. 627; Matter of Dexter Sulphite Pulp & P. Co. v. Shaver, 183 Misc. 275.) All concur, except Taylor, P. J., and Harris, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (The order dismisses petitioner’s application for a mandamus order to compel defendant to furnish to petitioner water for irrigation purposes.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, McCurn and Love, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D. 894, 56 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toan-v-village-of-perry-nyappdiv-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack