Toal v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Toal v. Brown

181 A.D.2d 581

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 181 A.D.2d 581 (Toal v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toal v. Brown, 181 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.), entered November 13, 1991, which to the extent appealed from, enjoined implementation of respondents’ solo supervisory patrol pro[582]*582gram for New York City Police Department sergeants pending the resolution of Sergeants Benevolent Association’s grievance proceeding concerning such program, including any related arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree that the award to which the application may be entitled may be rendered ineffectual without the injunction it seeks (CPLR 7502 [c]). As the IAS court concluded, "if ultimately the arbitrator rules that solo supervisory patrols should not have been implemented before the [petitioner] was consulted about training, that award would be meaningless to any officer who has been injured or killed.” Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.), entered November 13, 1991, which to the extent appealed from, enjoined implementation of respondents’ solo supervisory patrol pro[582]*582gram for New York City Police Department sergeants pending the resolution of Sergeants Benevolent Association’s grievance proceeding concerning such program, including any related arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree that the award to which the application may be entitled may be rendered ineffectual without the injunction it seeks (CPLR 7502 [c]). As the IAS court concluded, "if ultimately the arbitrator rules that solo supervisory patrols should not have been implemented before the [petitioner] was consulted about training, that award would be meaningless to any officer who has been injured or killed.” Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.D.2d 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toal-v-brown-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack