TOA Construction Co. v. Tsitsires

4 A.D.3d 141, 772 N.Y.S.2d 24, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1224
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 10, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 4 A.D.3d 141 (TOA Construction Co. v. Tsitsires) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TOA Construction Co. v. Tsitsires, 4 A.D.3d 141, 772 N.Y.S.2d 24, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1224 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered March 21, 2003, which affirmed orders of Civil Court, New York County (Timmie Eisner, J.), dated March 12, 2002, which (a) denied petitioner landlord’s motion to strike respondent tenant’s affirmative defense of mental disability, conditioned on respondent’s compliance with prior orders directing production of documents, and (b) denied petitioner’s motion to compel respondent to submit to an independent psychiatric examination, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to grant petitioner’s motion to compel, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court properly conditioned the striking of respondent’s affirmative defense of mental disability on his production of medical records pursuant to petitioner’s discovery demands. Although respondent delayed in producing these documents, his conduct was not willful or contumacious, and did not merit the drastic sanction of striking his answer unconditionally (Frye v City of New York, 228 AD2d 182 [1996]).

[142]*142Respondent did, however, place his mental condition in controversy (CPLR 3121 [a]) by asserting it as an affirmative defense in his pleadings and by submitting himself to an examination by a physician of his choice, the results of which he may seek in aid of his defense. Petitioner adequately demonstrated ample need for an independent psychiatric examination (New York Univ. v Farkas, 121 Misc 2d 643 [1983]). Concur—Nardelli, J.R, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ. (See 2003 NY Slip Op 5065KU).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of West Pierre Assoc. LLC v. Harvey
2025 NY Slip Op 04611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
WHGA Renaissance Apts., L.P. v. Jackson
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
WHGA Renaissance Apartments, L.P. v. Jackson
53 Misc. 3d 11 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matera v. Stram
27 Misc. 3d 1 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Spierer v. Bloomingdale's
37 A.D.3d 371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
TOA Construction Co. v. Tsitsires
14 Misc. 3d 65 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Hudson Street Equities Group v. Escoffier
11 Misc. 3d 63 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Toa Construction Co. v. Tsitsires
9 Misc. 3d 469 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 A.D.3d 141, 772 N.Y.S.2d 24, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toa-construction-co-v-tsitsires-nyappdiv-2004.