Ætna Lire Insurance v. North Star Mines Co.

New York Supreme Court

Ætna Lire Insurance v. North Star Mines Co.

55 Misc. 402, 106 N.Y.S. 545

DecidedJuly 15, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 55 Misc. 402 (Ætna Lire Insurance v. North Star Mines Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ætna Lire Insurance v. North Star Mines Co., 55 Misc. 402, 106 N.Y.S. 545 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Bischoff, J.

Because of what is doubtless an error in the form of the counterclaim demurred to, I cannot determine the issue of law upon the merits of the pleading, as to substance, and the demurrer must be sustained.

The action is for premiums upon policies of insurance against injury to employees of the defendant, and the counterclaim is based upon claims accruing to the employees [403]*403and collectible from the plaintiff by the defendant as “ trustee.”

There is no averment in the counterclaim that the parties had entered into any contractual relations, since the contract is not alleged otherwise than by reiteration of “ each and every allegation contained in the first, fourth and fifth paragraphs of this amended complaint.” Doubtless, the defendant intended to refer to the answer, not the complaint, but the issue of law must be determined upon the words employed. Besort to the complaint, which is not, indeed, an “ amended complaint,” does not aid' the counterclaim because the paragraphs referred to do not set forth the contract, and, as the counterclaim stands, there is no statement of fact to support the plaintiff’s liability to the defendant either as “ trustee ” or -otherwise.

The demurrer is, therefore, sustained, with costs, with leave to defendant to amend upon payment of costs within twenty days.

Demurrer sustained, with costs, with leave to defendant to amend upon payment of costs within twenty days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bischoff, J.

Because of what is doubtless an error in the form of the counterclaim demurred to, I cannot determine the issue of law upon the merits of the pleading, as to substance, and the demurrer must be sustained.

The action is for premiums upon policies of insurance against injury to employees of the defendant, and the counterclaim is based upon claims accruing to the employees [403]*403and collectible from the plaintiff by the defendant as “ trustee.”

There is no averment in the counterclaim that the parties had entered into any contractual relations, since the contract is not alleged otherwise than by reiteration of “ each and every allegation contained in the first, fourth and fifth paragraphs of this amended complaint.” Doubtless, the defendant intended to refer to the answer, not the complaint, but the issue of law must be determined upon the words employed. Besort to the complaint, which is not, indeed, an “ amended complaint,” does not aid' the counterclaim because the paragraphs referred to do not set forth the contract, and, as the counterclaim stands, there is no statement of fact to support the plaintiff’s liability to the defendant either as “ trustee ” or -otherwise.

The demurrer is, therefore, sustained, with costs, with leave to defendant to amend upon payment of costs within twenty days.

Demurrer sustained, with costs, with leave to defendant to amend upon payment of costs within twenty days.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 Misc. 402, 106 N.Y.S. 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tna-lire-insurance-v-north-star-mines-co-nysupct-1907.