Ǣtna Life Insurance v. Du Parquet, Huot & Moneuse Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Ǣtna Life Insurance v. Du Parquet, Huot & Moneuse Co.

122 N.Y.S. 688

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 12, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 122 N.Y.S. 688 (Ǣtna Life Insurance v. Du Parquet, Huot & Moneuse Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ǣtna Life Insurance v. Du Parquet, Huot & Moneuse Co., 122 N.Y.S. 688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the reargument of this appeal the opinions of all the Justices of the court remain unchanged. It appears to the majority, Mr. Justice GIEGERICH dissenting, that the policies covered the pay roll of all the employés at the plant- of the defendant at 43 and 45 Wooster street, and that in view of all the circumstances this plant includes the executive offices situated in the rear of 41 Wooster street. It appears, therefore, that the plaintiff is entitled to a premium based upon the pay roll of the employés at 41, 43, and 45 Wooster street.

In accordance with the opinions of the court heretofore filed, the judgment appealed from should be reversed, and judgment directed for the plaintiff for the amount of the premiums based on the pay rolls according to the stipulation of the .parties made at the trial, and the judgment directed upon the original argument should be modified to that extent. Settle form of order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon the reargument of this appeal the opinions of all the Justices of the court remain unchanged. It appears to the majority, Mr. Justice GIEGERICH dissenting, that the policies covered the pay roll of all the employés at the plant- of the defendant at 43 and 45 Wooster street, and that in view of all the circumstances this plant includes the executive offices situated in the rear of 41 Wooster street. It appears, therefore, that the plaintiff is entitled to a premium based upon the pay roll of the employés at 41, 43, and 45 Wooster street.

In accordance with the opinions of the court heretofore filed, the judgment appealed from should be reversed, and judgment directed for the plaintiff for the amount of the premiums based on the pay rolls according to the stipulation of the .parties made at the trial, and the judgment directed upon the original argument should be modified to that extent. Settle form of order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 N.Y.S. 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tna-life-insurance-v-du-parquet-huot-moneuse-co-nyappterm-1910.