Ætna Insurance v. Spillers

134 S.E. 791, 35 Ga. App. 766, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1110
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 23, 1926
Docket16990
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 S.E. 791 (Ætna Insurance v. Spillers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ætna Insurance v. Spillers, 134 S.E. 791, 35 Ga. App. 766, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1110 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

Where an insurance company issued and delivered a policy of insurance and accepted in payment of the premium a promissory note of the insured showing that its consideration was the identical policy, the insurance company will be held to have waived the provision of the policy that it should be valid only when signed by the local agent, and a plea of failure of consideration was no defense to a suit upon the note. See, in this connection, Rogers v. American National Ins. Co., 145 Ga. 570 (89 S. E. 700) ; Massachusetts Benefit Life Asso. v. Robinson, 104 Ga. 256 (4) (30 S. E. 918, 42 L. R. A. 261) ; Darsey v. Insurance Co. of North America, 32 Ga. App. 458 (123 S. E. 622). The defendant having recovered a verdict, the court erred in overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reeves v. Progressive Life Insurance
69 S.E.2d 882 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S.E. 791, 35 Ga. App. 766, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tna-insurance-v-spillers-gactapp-1926.