Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hawn Lumber Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hawn Lumber Co.

98 S.W.2d 167

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 19, 1936

DocketMotion No. 12702; No. 6672

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 98 S.W.2d 167 (Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hawn Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hawn Lumber Co., 98 S.W.2d 167 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

GERMAN, Commissioner.

The trial court in this cause rendered judgment against C. W. McBride in favor of the following parties: Malakoff Fuel Company for the sum of $384.82; Jet Crawford for the sum of $216; and for George Criddle for the sum of $48.65. It was further adjudged that 45.51 per cent, of these judgments was to be paid out of the fund retained by the school district. None of the parties on appeal complained of these judgments, and none of the parties mentioned were named in the appeal bonds. While in our original opinion (97 S.W.(2d) 460) we discussed generally the disposition to be made of this retained fund and reversed and remanded the cause in that regard, with instructions as to its disposition, yet we were not authorized to disturb the judgments rendered in favor of the parties above named. As to them and their right to participate in this retained fund on the basis set out in the trial court’s judgment, we have concluded that said judgment was final. Our former opinion and judgment as to the retained fund is therefore modified so as not to affect the rights of the parties above mentioned.

With this explanation, the motion of defendant in error Hahn Lumber Company is overruled.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GERMAN, Commissioner.

The trial court in this cause rendered judgment against C. W. McBride in favor of the following parties: Malakoff Fuel Company for the sum of $384.82; Jet Crawford for the sum of $216; and for George Criddle for the sum of $48.65. It was further adjudged that 45.51 per cent, of these judgments was to be paid out of the fund retained by the school district. None of the parties on appeal complained of these judgments, and none of the parties mentioned were named in the appeal bonds. While in our original opinion (97 S.W.(2d) 460) we discussed generally the disposition to be made of this retained fund and reversed and remanded the cause in that regard, with instructions as to its disposition, yet we were not authorized to disturb the judgments rendered in favor of the parties above named. As to them and their right to participate in this retained fund on the basis set out in the trial court’s judgment, we have concluded that said judgment was final. Our former opinion and judgment as to the retained fund is therefore modified so as not to affect the rights of the parties above mentioned.

With this explanation, the motion of defendant in error Hahn Lumber Company is overruled.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 S.W.2d 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tna-casualty-surety-co-v-hawn-lumber-co-tex-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack