Ætna Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hobson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Ætna Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hobson

108 P. 79, 82 Kan. 857, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 356

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedApril 9, 1910

DocketNo. 16,457

StatusPublished

This text of 108 P. 79 (Ætna Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ætna Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hobson, 108 P. 79, 82 Kan. 857, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 356 (kan 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The action was properly instituted in the district court, because the title to land was in controversy, a subject which falls outside the scope of probate jurisdiction; but the petition was .demurrable because the deed pleaded shows title was taken by Ira E. Hobson as trustee for Pauline and Helen Hobson. (Loan Co. v. Essex, 66 Kan. 100, and cases cited in the opinion.) There is no difficulty in harmonizing the various parts of the deed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The action was properly instituted in the district court, because the title to land was in controversy, a subject which falls outside the scope of probate jurisdiction; but the petition was .demurrable because the deed pleaded shows title was taken by Ira E. Hobson as trustee for Pauline and Helen Hobson. (Loan Co. v. Essex, 66 Kan. 100, and cases cited in the opinion.) There is no difficulty in harmonizing the various parts of the deed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 P. 79, 82 Kan. 857, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tna-building-loan-assn-v-hobson-kan-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack