Ætna Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hobson
108 P. 79, 82 Kan. 857, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 356
Opinion
The action was properly instituted in the district court, because the title to land was in controversy, a subject which falls outside the scope of probate jurisdiction; but the petition was .demurrable because the deed pleaded shows title was taken by Ira E. Hobson as trustee for Pauline and Helen Hobson. (Loan Co. v. Essex, 66 Kan. 100, and cases cited in the opinion.) There is no difficulty in harmonizing the various parts of the deed.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ætna Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hobson, 108 P. 79, 82 Kan. 857, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 356 (kan 1910).
108 P. 79 (Ætna Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hobson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Essex
71 P. 268 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1903)