TMS Logistics v. David Laycock

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 5, 2015·No. 15-3007·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

TMS LOGISTICS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-3007

DAVID LAYCOCK,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 6, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari – Original Jurisdiction.

E.T. Fernandez, III, Sorena S. Fallin, and Erin-Elizabeth Dolan of Fernandez Trial Lawyers, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Michelline H. Ruth and William W. Kurtz, Jr. of the Law Offices of Ronald E. Sholes, P.A., Jacksonville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

BENTON, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TMS Logistics v. David Laycock, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

TMS Logistics v. David Laycock (TMS Logistics v. David Laycock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.