TMS Logistics v. David Laycock

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 5, 2015
Docket15-3007
StatusPublished

This text of TMS Logistics v. David Laycock (TMS Logistics v. David Laycock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TMS Logistics v. David Laycock, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

TMS LOGISTICS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-3007

DAVID LAYCOCK,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 6, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari – Original Jurisdiction.

E.T. Fernandez, III, Sorena S. Fallin, and Erin-Elizabeth Dolan of Fernandez Trial Lawyers, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Michelline H. Ruth and William W. Kurtz, Jr. of the Law Offices of Ronald E. Sholes, P.A., Jacksonville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

BENTON, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
TMS Logistics v. David Laycock, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tms-logistics-v-david-laycock-fladistctapp-2015.